Will Document Authentication

Dispute over two wills - one leaving property to family, another to caregiver. Students will analyze signatures and assess testamentary capacity.

# Aplly.xyz Case Study Submission

## Title
Will Document Authentication

## Type
Investigative Forensics

## Difficulty
Intermediate

## Estimated Time
60 minutes

## Overview
Dispute over two wills - one leaving property to family, another to caregiver. Students will analyze signatures and assess testamentary capacity.

## Case Details

Function Focus: Investigative Forensics — manual reasoning, decomposition, and critical judgment (no spreadsheet or AI tool permitted in Phase 1)

Scenario:
You are the analyst at a fictional consultancy ("Praxis Advisors") tasked with answering: Will Document Authentication. You have a clean, synthetic dataset described below. You must produce a defensible answer using structured reasoning — no tool-assisted shortcut on the first pass.

Dataset Structure:
- document_id
- testator_name
- date_of_will
- date_of_death
- witness_count
- witness_signature_verified
- notary_seal_genuine
- paper_vintage
- ink_match_date
- handwriting_analysis_result
- digital_signature
- beneficiary_pattern
- previous_will_exists
- suppressed_will_alleged
- court_ruling

Tasks:
1. Read the dataset and reconstruct the sequence of events/evidence. State explicitly which records are confirmed facts vs. inference.
2. Identify the key anomaly or cluster that points to a primary suspect, source, or mechanism. Explain your filtering logic by hand.
3. Build a timeline or network diagram on paper linking the relevant records, showing how the evidence chain connects.
4. Weigh at least two alternative explanations (hypotheses) for the finding and use the data to eliminate one. Be explicit about what data would change your conclusion.
5. Only after completing the above manually, verify your filtering/timeline with a spreadsheet or tool and note any discrepancy.

Expected Output:
A one-page investigation memo: findings, evidence chain/timeline, eliminated hypotheses, final conclusion with confidence level.

Evaluation Criteria:
Quality of evidence-chain logic, explicit fact-vs-inference separation, correctness of hypothesis elimination, defensibility of the conclusion.

## Data Sources

| document_id | testator_name | date_of_will | date_of_death | witness_count | witness_signature_verified | notary_seal_genuine | paper_vintage | ink_match_date | handwriting_analysis_result | digital_signature | beneficiary_pattern | previous_will_exists | suppressed_will_alleged | court_ruling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | 85 | False | 85 | Medium | Arrested | Dropped | False | Yes | Low | N/A | Inactive | True | Low | 3.5 |
| Active | Compromised | 2026-04-01 | Inactive | 3.5 | WIT-0145-002 | Resolved | 42 | Arrested | 100000 | High | False | 2026-04-01 | Dropped | Compromised |
| Inactive | Rural | 42 | Compromised | Confirmed | WIT-0145-003 | Closed | 2026-04-01 | INK-0145-003 | Detected | DIG-0145-003 | 2026-03-15 | Confirmed | 3.5 | |
| Chennai | Filed | Chennai | | WIT-0145-004 | Resolved | 25000 | Filed | 2026-04-01 | Urban | DIG-0145-004 | BEN-0145-004 | PRE-0145-004 | 12.5 | Inconclusive |
| 100000 | Secure | Delhi | 42 | Unresolved | Inactive | High | 3.5 | | Unresolved | Active | BEN-0145-005 | Positive | Delhi | Arrested |
| At large | TES-0145-006 | 2026-03-15 | Under investigation | 2026-04-01 | 2026-03-15 | NOT-0145-006 | Positive | 2026-03-15 | Confirmed | DIG-0145-006 | BEN-0145-006 | Yes | Confirmed | Under investigation |
| DOC-0145-007 | Filed | Low | Kolkata | 3.5 | Bangalore | 85 | Kolkata | At large | No | Pending | BEN-0145-007 | Confirmed | Secure | Under investigation |
| No | Mumbai | 1 | Active | 0 | Delhi | No | Secure | Unresolved | HAN-0145-008 | Resolved | True | Inconclusive | No | Yes |
| DOC-0145-009 | Bangalore | At large | High | Kolkata | WIT-0145-009 | Rural | Active | Inconclusive | HAN-0145-009 | High | At large | False | | COU-0145-009 |
| Low | 3.5 | True | Dropped | 42 | Urban | NOT-0145-010 | 0 | INK-0145-010 | 100000 | 1 | At large | Positive | High | 2026-03-15 |


Full dataset: https://github.com/arora200/aplly_case_db/datasets/093-forgery-will-authentication (synthetic, 13 records)

## Solution Frameworks
Evidence chain reconstruction, hypothesis testing (deductive elimination), timeline analysis, pattern & anomaly detection, source corroboration

## Solver Guidance & Tutorials
_Solver guidance added by the pipeline (tutorial links) — see `solver_guidance` field._

## What You'll Learn
- Rebuild a chain of events from partial records
- Separate confirmed fact from inference
- Eliminate hypotheses with data

## Tags
Will Fraud, Document Authentication, Signature Analysis, Succession Law

## Registration Links
Register as Solver / Register as Evaluator